YapSatInteractive Structural Analysis
Force Method · Problem 4 of 7All problems

Force Method ExampleBeam with an overhang and a negative reaction

Problem. The beam is fixed at A, has rollers at B and C, and is free at D. A uniform load of 16 kN/m acts on span BC, and a 12 kN point load acts at D. EI is constant. Use the force method to find the support reactions and draw the shear and moment diagrams.

Beam fixed at A with rollers at B and C and a 2 m overhang: 16 kN/m uniform load on BC and a 12 kN point load at D
Figure 1. The beam, its loads, and its dimensions.
Try it yourself before reading the solution. Show the results
AyA_{y}
−11.08 kN
MAM_{A}
−18.46 kN·m
ByB_{y}
61.23 kN
CyC_{y}
57.85 kN

Solution

1Redundants and the primary structure

The beam is statically indeterminate to degree 22. Choose 2 redundants and remove them; what remains is the statically determinate primary structure.

Primary structure: a cantilever fixed at A, with the other supports removed.

Redundants: X1=ByX_{1} = B_{y}X2=CyX_{2} = C_{y}

16 kN/m12 kNX₁X₂ABCD
Primary structure: the released reactions are shown as X arrows

Remove B and C and what remains is a cantilever fixed at A. Working in from the free end, its moments are easy to write.

2M0 diagram (primary structure, actual loads)
A−924B−384C−24D
M0, A–B(ξ)=−924+108ξM_{0,\,A\text{–}B}(\xi) = -924 + 108\xiM0, B–C(ξ)=−384+108ξ−8ξ2M_{0,\,B\text{–}C}(\xi) = -384 + 108\xi - 8\xi^2M0, C–D(ξ)=−24+12ξM_{0,\,C\text{–}D}(\xi) = -24 + 12\xi

Check the −924 kN·m at A by hand: 96 kN × 8 m + 12 kN × 13 m.

3Unit-load (virtual) diagrams

A unit value of each redundant is applied to the primary structure separately; the resulting mim_i moment diagrams are:

m1m_{1}: X1=1X_{1}=1 (unit load at support B)
A5BCD
m1, A–B(ξ)=5−ξm_{1,\,A\text{–}B}(\xi) = 5 - \xim1, B–C(ξ)=0m_{1,\,B\text{–}C}(\xi) = 0m1, C–D(ξ)=0m_{1,\,C\text{–}D}(\xi) = 0
m2m_{2}: X2=1X_{2}=1 (unit load at support C)
A11B6CD
m2, A–B(ξ)=11−ξm_{2,\,A\text{–}B}(\xi) = 11 - \xim2, B–C(ξ)=6−ξm_{2,\,B\text{–}C}(\xi) = 6 - \xim2, C–D(ξ)=0m_{2,\,C\text{–}D}(\xi) = 0
4Flexibility coefficients and compatibility

By virtual work, δij=∫mimjEIdx\delta_{ij}=\int\frac{m_i m_j}{EI}dx, δi0=∫M0miEIdx\delta_{i0}=\int\frac{M_0 m_i}{EI}dx (with constant EI, the 1/EI cancels): EI = 30,000 kN·m²

δ11=41.67EI\delta_{11} = \dfrac{41.67}{EI}δ12=116.67EI\delta_{12} = \dfrac{116.67}{EI}δ22=443.67EI\delta_{22} = \dfrac{443.67}{EI}δ10=−9300EI\delta_{10} = \dfrac{-9300}{EI}δ20=−32,808EI\delta_{20} = \dfrac{-32{,}808}{EI}

Compatibility ∑jδijXj+δi0=0\sum_j \delta_{ij}X_j + \delta_{i0}=0:

41.67 X1+116.67 X2=930041.67\,X_{1} + 116.67\,X_{2} = 9300116.67 X1+443.67 X2=32,808116.67\,X_{1} + 443.67\,X_{2} = 32{,}808
X1=By=61.23 kNX_{1} = B_{y} = 61.23\ \text{kN}X2=Cy=57.85 kNX_{2} = C_{y} = 57.85\ \text{kN}

Get δ11\delta_{11} by hand: m1m_1 is a triangle with base and height 5, so ∫m12 dx=5⋅52/3=41.67\int m_1^2\,dx = 5 \cdot 5^2 / 3 = 41.67.

5Support reactions (superposition) and check
Ay=−11.08 kN,MA=−18.46 kN⋅mA_{y} = -11.08\ \text{kN},\quad M_{A} = -18.46\ \text{kN·m}By=61.23 kNB_{y} = 61.23\ \text{kN}Cy=57.85 kNC_{y} = 57.85\ \text{kN}

Support moments from the reactions, by cutting the beam (sagging positive):

MB=−36.92 kN⋅mM_{B} = -36.92\ \text{kN·m}MC=−24 kN⋅mM_{C} = -24\ \text{kN·m}
16 kN/m12 kN11.1M=18.46 ↻61.257.8ABCD
Equilibrium check: loads and support reactions together
SupportRx (kN)Ry (kN)M (kN·m, ccw +)
A0-11.08-18.46
B061.230
C057.850
Equilibrium check (ΣFx, ΣFy, and ΣM about the origin):
ΣFx0.00 (reactions) + 0.00 (loads) = 0.00 kN ✓
ΣFy108.00 (reactions) − 108.00 (loads) = 0.00 kN ✓
ΣM0924.00 (reactions) − 924.00 (loads) = 0.00 kN·m ✓

✓ The reactions match the matrix (direct stiffness) solution (largest difference 1.6 × 10⁻⁸ kN or kN·m).

AyA_y came out negative, so support A pulls the beam down. That isn't an error: the load on BC lifts span AB about B.

6Member equilibrium check (free-body diagrams)

Each member is cut free: starting from the reactions, equilibrium gives its end moments and shears (∑M=0, ∑F=0\sum M = 0,\ \sum F = 0). The arcs and arrows are the end moments and forces acting on the member (kN, kN·m), and each box is in equilibrium on its own.

AB18.536.911.111.1BC36.924.050.245.816 kN/mCD24.012.012 kN
Bending moment diagram of the beam with an overhang: 18.46 at A, −36.92 at B, a maximum of 41.68 in span BC, and −24.00 kN·m at C
Figure 2. Bending moment (kN·m).
Shear diagram of the beam with an overhang: −11.08 in span AB, 50.15 just right of B, and 12.00 kN just right of C
Figure 3. Shear force (kN).

Results

AyA_{y}
−11.08 kN
MAM_{A}
−18.46 kN·m
ByB_{y}
61.23 kN
CyC_{y}
57.85 kN

Matches the independent stiffness solution.

Common mistakes

  • A negative VAV_A is often taken for an arithmetic error. Under this loading, support A really does pull the beam down.
  • The 12 kN load at the tip of the overhang must be included. The −24 kN·m moment at C comes from it.
  • In δ10\delta_{10} and δ20\delta_{20}, reading the ordinate from the wrong diagram directly changes the result. An open-access textbook has a wrong answer for this reason.

Solve your own structure in YapSat

YapSat writes the solution steps on this page for the structures you draw, too. It solves beams and frames step by step by moment distribution, slope deflection, the force method, and the stiffness method, and also handles trusses, arches, influence lines, and deflections. Open this problem to change its loads, spans, and supports and see how the results respond. It's free and needs no account.

Open this problem in the appThe app runs on computers and tablets.